Technique taxonomy
How images do their work, sorted by mechanism rather than by style. Four questions open into eight domains and 97 techniques, and every technique is counted against the desk's library of 9,415 saved references.
97 techniques, counted
Point at a spoke to read it
How to read it
Read from the center out. The inner ring is the question an image asks of its viewer, the middle ring is the domain it works through, and each spoke is one technique. Spoke length is how many references use it, on a square-root scale: the longest, tone on tone, is in 972; the shortest, simultaneous contrast, in 1.
- Differentiate What is different here?4,915 references
- Group What belongs together?3,636 references
- Sequence Where do I look next?1,097 references
- Infer What does this mean beyond what I see?3,411 references
Counts from the desk's reference library on 2026-11-06: 8,385 of 9,415 references carry at least one technique, 15,461 tags in all. Two raters labeled the same 60 references independently and chose the same lead technique 75% of the time. Images stay off the map because they are other people's work. The four-level structure is inspired by Jason Swet's work-in-progress "taxonomy of visuals" (2026). The taxonomy is open: GitHub.
Browse all 97 techniques
Differentiate What is different here?
Feature
- Glow911
- Saturation accent861
- Complementary pairing467
- Value accent373
- Texture against flat252
- Warm–cool split245
- Scale disparity229
- Silhouette214
- Chiaroscuro212
- Selective focus141
- Exaggeration56
- Pop-out52
- Rim light31
- Simultaneous contrast1
Space
- Halo framing407
- Isolation in void373
- Frame within a frame188
- Center placement183
- Viewpoint171
- Split comparison40
- Frame break34
Gestalt
- Pattern break27
Social
- Direct gaze331
Semantic
- Semantic contrast221
Encoding
- Highlight and mute163
- Size encoding17
- Color scale16
- Common baseline9
Group What belongs together?
Feature
- Tone on tone972
- Similarity883
- Value massing292
- Color blocking82
Gestalt
- Repetition555
- Symmetry460
- Connection236
- Density emergence193
- Common region113
- Good continuation91
- Self-similarity53
- Proximity19
Social
- Face schema10
Time
- Stagger25
- Common fate8
- Shape morph6
Encoding
- Categorical hue78
- Direct labeling72
- Small multiples25
Sequence Where do I look next?
Feature
- Size hierarchy130
Space
- Depth layering235
- Leading lines186
Social
- Viewer stand-in131
- Body vector107
- Gaze cue58
Cultural
- Reading path26
- Pointer25
Time
- Progressive reveal66
- Temporal synthesis51
- Staging49
- Type-on34
- Camera move23
- Panel rhythm14
- Draw-on13
- Masked reveal9
Encoding
- Annotation32
- Layering and separation18
Infer What does this mean beyond what I see?
Feature
- Arbitrary color90
Space
- Transparency327
- Occlusion249
- Crop at the edge166
- Cast-light pattern103
- Warped grid39
- Forced perspective2
Gestalt
- Closure40
- Hidden image25
- Figure-ground reversal6
Social
- Implied presence137
- Anthropomorphism85
- First-person view81
Semantic
- Anchorage320
- Fusion249
- Graphic overlay191
- Contextual metaphor97
- Form substitution61
- Word as image53
- Side-by-side analogy35
- Rebus5
Cultural
- Visible facture588
- Learned symbol341
- Genre quotation148
- Visual quotation38
- Sound lettering26
Time
- Implied motion282
- Pregnant moment39
- Gutter closure13
- Count-up13
- Match cut4
Encoding
- Pictorial units3
Why it matters
A critique that names the mechanism can be checked. When a review says a homepage uses a saturation accent to make one claim unmissable, or similarity to tie the wrong things together, anyone can look and agree or disagree. That's the standard the desk holds its trust audits to: name the mechanism, show the evidence, count it.
The full project